The Problem
Article 4 is deliberately vague about what constitutes 'sufficient' AI literacy. This means organisations must define the standard themselves — and whoever does it first controls the narrative.
Meanwhile, AI is simultaneously eliminating entry-level jobs (where people learn) AND automating senior tasks. The result: 'competence debt' builds silently while nobody measures it.
What's Covered
Four modules that transform regulatory ambiguity into a clear action plan
Article 4 Decoded
What the regulation actually requires — and what it deliberately leaves vague
The Competence Paradox
Why AI eliminates the jobs where people learn, creating invisible competence debt
Gap Analysis Workshop
Map your organisation's current AI literacy against Article 4 requirements
Implementation Roadmap
Build a practical compliance timeline with measurable milestones
Who Attends
Chief Legal Officers and General Counsel
Compliance Officers and Risk Managers
Practice Group Leaders
Legal Operations Directors
HR Directors (AI training mandates)
Board members with AI oversight duties